Copyright© 2002 by School Services of California, Inc.

Volume 15                   For Publication Date: December 20, 2002             No. 25

 

Assembly Budget Subcommittee #2 on Education
Listens to Education Community—Don’t Cut My Program

The first legislative hearing to specifically review the Governor’s mid-year budget cuts to education took place in a packed Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors’ chamber on December 18, 2002 , just a short time after the startling news was released that the state now faces a $34.8 billion Budget shortfall.  

Assembly Member Joe Simitian (D-Palo Alto), chair of the Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on School Finance, led discussions on ways to mitigate the impact of the cuts on school agencies and alternatives to the Governor’s proposed across-the-board cut of 3.66%. Subcommittee members Carol Liu (D-La Canada), Wilma Chan (D-Oakland), Jackie Goldberg (D-Los Angeles), and Lynn Daucher (R-Brea) spent more than four hours listening to presentations from the Department of Finance, Legislative Analyst’s Office, Secretary for Education’s Office, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Delaine Eastin, and all segments of the education community.


State Superintendent Delaine Eastin made an impassioned speech criticizing the size of the proposed education cuts, calling them “sinful,” and stating that the current proposal would financially pull the rug out from under many K-14 districts that have contracts in place that prevent layoffs and few other options to make cuts with the school year already  half over. She also urged lawmakers to raise taxes to help close the Budget gap, reminding them how former Republican Governor Pete Wilson and the Legislature closed a $14 billion shortfall in 1990 by raising the sales tax, personal income taxes for the wealthy, and vehicle license fees.  

Robert Turnage, Vice Chancellor for Fiscal Policy, spoke on behalf of the community colleges. He told the committee that community college apportionments were being reduced by $184 million—a 4.8% cut. The community college higher education system serves the most students (2 million), receive the least amount of revenues per student, but are faced with the largest percentage reduction by the Administration. Turnage further made reference to the Administration’s proposed $80 million reduction to concurrently enrolled student programs. He indicated that if colleges were conducting inappropriate classes the system would take action. The $80 million number may not be accurate. Superintendent Eastin also spoke in support of K-12 students enrolling in community college classes.  

An estimated 400 people jammed the hearing room during the public comment period, and the Subcommittee heard from more than 90 members of the public, including several school board members, superintendents, and teachers from neighboring school districts. Representatives from community college faculty and students presented a united front, rejecting across-the-board cuts and reminding Subcommittee members that cuts to community colleges will hurt students and limit access.

 

                                                                                                                                                                                 Arnold Bray