Copyright© 2004 by School Services of California, Inc.

Volume 17                   For Publication Date: December 17, 2004             No. 24

 

Contribution Levels Could Increase for Both Employer
and Employee Members of CalSTRS
 

With a massive funding shortfall looming, the State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS) is considering increasing pension contributions or reducing benefits for newly hired teachers. CalSTRS officials predict benefits for future retirees may have to be cut by $50 to $500 a month to erase a funding gap estimated to be $23.1 billion in the next 30 years.  

The following is a series of options that may be considered by CalSTRS:  

§       The state could sell pension obligation bonds. CalSTRS would use the proceeds to increase investments, hoping to generate enough returns to pay off the bonds and close the shortfall.  

§       The $23.1 billion pension obligation could be paid off over 40 years, instead of 30 years. This would siphon off investment returns and contributions over a longer period, rather than investing them.  

§       Benefits could be reduced for teachers hired after January 1, 2006. This includes basing final pension on the highest three years of compensation instead of the current one year. Credit for years of service and unused sick leave would no longer be used to calculate benefits. Retirees would be required to pay for Medicare coverage.  

§       CalSTRS could eliminate an annual cost-of-living adjustment of 2%.  

Most of the changes that CalSTRS may consider implementing must be approved by the Legislature, including higher contribution rates by new teachers, school districts, or the state. By far, raising contributions would be the quickest way to wipe out the shortfall. But CalSTRS is reluctant to move down that path because the state and school districts are wrestling with budget deficits and teachers are being hit by rising costs, including higher health-care premiums.  

CalSTRS is not alone in dealing with an under-funded pension. During the unprecedented bull market in the 1990s, pension plans had extra cash and many, including CalSTRS, raised benefits. A CalSTRS consultant concludes that the pension fund needs an infusion of $1 billion in the next two years to ensure there is enough money to fund benefits 30 years from now. That amount could change when a new analysis comes out this spring.  

Staff at CalSTRS, the nation’s third largest public pension plan with $118 billion in assets, have reassured beneficiaries that the shortfall won’t jeopardize pensions for its 735,000 retired and active teachers since they are guaranteed by law. CalSTRS say the fund is sound and there is enough money to pay benefits for another two decades—even if contributions remain unchanged.

 

Arnold Bray